. We'll translate each part.
First paragraph: "The New York City Council has opened an investigation into Kalshi, Polymarket, Coinbase and Gemini Titan over claims the platforms use predatory marketing to pull in young users. Speaker Julie Menin sent letters to all four companies this week, giving them 14 days to disclose user numbers, marketing methods and revenue generated in the city."
Translation: "New York Citys råd har åpnet en gransking av Kalshi, Polymarket, Coinbase og Gemini Titan etter påstander om at plattformene bruker predatorisk markedsføring for å tiltrekke unge brukere. Ordfører Julie Menin sendte denne uken brev til alle fire selskapene, og ga dem 14 dager til å oppgi brukertall, markedsføringsmetoder og inntekter generert i byen."
Note: "Speaker" here is the Speaker of the City Council, so "Ordfører" might be misleading because "ordfører" is mayor. Actually, in Norwegian, "Speaker" of a council is often "president" or "leder". But Julie Menin is the Speaker of the NYC Council, so we can say "talsperson" or "leder". But to be accurate, we can use "Speaker" as a title, but it's better to translate as "rådsleder" or "ordfører" (but that's mayor). I'll use "Speaker Julie Menin" as proper noun, but maybe "Julie Menin, som er speaker i rådet," but we can just say "Speaker Julie Menin" and keep it. In Norwegian, we might say "Julie Menin, som leder rådet," but to preserve the title, I'll keep "Speaker" and add a note? Actually, the requirement says keep proper nouns in original form, so "Speaker Julie Menin" is a proper noun? But "Speaker" is a title, not a name. We can translate as "Rådsleder Julie Menin" or "Speaker Julie Menin". I'll use "Rådsleder Julie Menin" to be clear, but then "Speaker" is not kept. Alternatively, we can say "Julie Menin, som er speaker i byrådet," but that's wordy. I'll use "Speaker Julie Menin" as is, since it's a title and part of the name? Actually, it's a title, but it's common to keep titles like "Speaker" in English. I'll keep it as "Speaker Julie Menin" and add a note? But the instruction says keep proper nouns (names, company names) in original form. "Speaker" is not a name, but a title. I think it's fine to translate to "Rådsleder" or "Ordfører" but that might be confusing. I'll use "Speaker Julie Menin" for consistency, but in Norwegian text, we might write "Speaker Julie Menin" as a title. I'll do that.
Second paragraph: "What the letters demand" -> "Hva brevene krever" (or "Hva brevene etterspør"). I'll use "Hva brevene krever".
Content: "Menin's letters ask for specifics. The inquiry targets marketing that may be false, deceptive or abusive, with a particular eye on ads aimed at young people. The Council noted that the marketing restrictions and consumer protections that apply to casinos and licensed sportsbooks don't cover these platforms. Menin said the Council would use its full power against predatory marketing."
Translation: "Menins brev ber om konkrete opplysninger. Granskingen retter seg mot markedsføring som kan være falsk, villedende eller utilbørlig, med særlig fokus på annonser rettet mot unge. Rådet bemerket at markedsføringsrestriksjonene og forbrukerbeskyttelsen som gjelder for kasinoer og lisensierte sportsbook-operatører, ikke dekker disse plattformene. Menin sa at rådet vil bruke all sin makt mot predatorisk markedsføring."
Third paragraph: "The influencer problem" -> "Influencer-problemet" or "Påvirkerproblemet". I'll use "Influencer-problemet".
Content: "The Council will investigate claims that Polymarket used influencers to draw young adults into wagering through misleading marketing. That includes undisclosed promotions, fake trades, staged wins and encouragement of insider trading. Harvey Epstein, chair of the Committee on Consumer and Worker Protection, cited forecasts of $300 billion in annual prediction market volume."
Translation: "Rådet vil undersøke påstander om at Polymarket brukte influencere til å trekke unge voksne inn i veddemål gjennom villedende markedsføring. Dette inkluderer ikke-oppgitte kampanjer, falske handler, iscenesatte gevinster og oppfordring til innsidehandel. Harvey Epstein, leder for komiteen for forbruker- og arbeiderbeskyttelse, siterte prognoser om 300 milliarder dollar i årlig volum i prediksjonsmarkeder."
Note: "prediction market" is often "prediksjonsmarked" in Norwegian.
Fourth paragraph: "A growing legal pile" -> "En voksende juridisk haug" or "En økende mengde rettssaker". I'll use "En voksende juridisk haug" but that sounds informal. Maybe "En økende juridisk byrde" or "Flere søksmål". I'll use "En voksende juridisk haug" as it's a metaphor, but in Norwegian we can say "En voksende haug av rettssaker". I'll use "En voksende juridisk haug" to keep the tone.
Content: "New York State Attorney General Letitia James sued Kalshi in July and Coinbase and Gemini in April. Kentucky's attorney general sued Kalshi and Polymarket in June. Wisconsin's DOJ brought a case against Kalshi, Robinhood, Coinbase, Polymarket and Crypto.com. The CFTC sued New York in April over state gambling enforcement, arguing federal law overrides state statutes."
Translation: "New York State Attorney General Letitia James saksøkte Kalshi i juli og Coinbase og Gemini i april. Kentuckys justisminister saksøkte Kalshi og Polymarket i juni. Wisconsins justisdepartement reiste sak mot Kalshi, Robinhood, Coinbase, Polymarket og Crypto.com. CFTC saksøkte New York i april angående statlig håndheving av gambling, og argumenterte for at føderal lov overstyrer statlige lover."
Note: "Attorney General" is "justisminister" in Norwegian, but in US context it's often "riksadvokat" or "statsadvokat". For state AG, we can say "delstatsadvokat" or just "Attorney General". To be safe, I'll keep "Attorney General" as proper noun? Actually, it's a title. I'll use "New York State Attorney General" as is, but maybe "New York-statsadvokat Letitia James". But to preserve proper nouns, I'll keep "Letitia James" and say "New York State Attorney General" as title. I'll write "New York State Attorney General Letitia James" as is, but in Norwegian we might say "New York State Attorney General Letitia James" because it's a title. I'll keep it as is.
Fifth paragraph: "The preemption question" -> "Spørsmålet om føderal
