Treasury Targets Iranian Digital Assets With Secondary Sanctions

and

tags. We'll translate the text inside. Let's translate title: "Treasury Targets Iranian Digital Assets With Secondary Sanctions" -> "Treasury kohdistaa Iranin digitaalisiin varoihin toissijaisia pakotteita" or something. But "secondary sanctions" is a term, in Finnish often "toissijaiset pakotteet" or "sekundaariset pakotteet". I'll use "toissijaiset pakotteet". Also "targets" -> "kohdistaa" or "kohdentaa". "Iranian digital assets" -> "Iranin digitaalisiin varoihin". So title: "Treasury kohdistaa Iranin digitaalisiin varoihin toissijaisia pakotteita" but that's a bit long. Alternatively: "Treasury asettaa Iranin digitaaliset varat toissijaisten pakotteiden kohteeksi" - but we need to keep it concise. I'll go with "Treasury kohdistaa Iranin digitaalisiin varoihin toissijaisia pakotteita". Now content: We'll translate each paragraph. First paragraph: "The U.S. Department of the Treasury has folded digital assets into its Iran sanctions program, naming the sector critical for enforcement under a campaign it calls Operation Economic Outcast. Under Executive Order 13902, any nation or person engaged with Iranian digital assets can now be hit with secondary sanctions — regardless of where they're located." Translation: "Yhdysvaltain valtiovarainministeriö on sisällyttänyt digitaaliset varat Iranin pakoteohjelmaansa ja nimennyt sektorin kriittiseksi täytäntöönpanon kannalta kampanjassa, jota se kutsuu Operation Economic Outcastiksi. Toimeenpanomääräyksen 13902 nojalla mikä tahansa valtio tai henkilö, joka on tekemisissä Iranin digitaalisten varojen kanssa, voi nyt joutua toissijaisten pakotteiden kohteeksi riippumatta siitä, missä he sijaitsevat." But we need to keep "U.S. Department of the Treasury" as is? The instruction says keep proper nouns in original form. So I'll keep "U.S. Department of the Treasury" as is. But that's a proper noun. So I'll write: "U.S. Department of the Treasury on sisällyttänyt..." But that might be awkward. Alternatively, we can use "Yhdysvaltain valtiovarainministeriö" but that's a translation. I think it's acceptable to translate the name of the department, as it's a common translation. But the instruction says "Keep proper nouns (names, company names) in original form" - so "Treasury" is a name, but "U.S. Department of the Treasury" is a full name. I'll keep it as "U.S. Department of the Treasury" to be safe. But in Finnish, it's common to say "Yhdysvaltain valtiovarainministeriö". However, the instruction is explicit. I'll keep it as "U.S. Department of the Treasury" but that might be too long. Actually, the original article uses "Treasury" later. So I'll use "Treasury" for brevity. In the first mention, we can say "U.S. Department of the Treasury" but then later "Treasury". I'll keep "U.S. Department of the Treasury" as is, but then in subsequent mentions, use "Treasury". But the instruction says keep proper nouns in original form, so I'll keep "Treasury" as is. So I'll translate: "U.S. Department of the Treasury on sisällyttänyt digitaaliset varat Iranin pakoteohjelmaansa..." That's fine. But we need to ensure the translation is natural. I'll write: "Yhdysvaltain valtiovarainministeriö" is more natural, but I'll follow the instruction. I'll keep "U.S. Department of the Treasury" as is. Actually, the instruction says "Keep proper nouns (names, company names) in original form" - so "U.S. Department of the Treasury" is a proper noun, so we keep it. So I'll write: "U.S. Department of the Treasury on sisällyttänyt digitaaliset varat Iranin pakoteohjelmaansa ja nimennyt sektorin kriittiseksi täytäntöönpanon kannalta kampanjassa, jota se kutsuu Operation Economic Outcastiksi. Toimeenpanomääräyksen 13902 nojalla mikä tahansa valtio tai henkilö, joka on tekemisissä Iranin digitaalisten varojen kanssa, voi nyt joutua toissijaisten pakotteiden kohteeksi riippumatta siitä, missä he sijaitsevat." But "Operation Economic Outcast" is a name, keep as is. "Executive Order 13902" - we can translate "Executive Order" as "toimeenpanomääräys" but it's a proper noun? Actually, it's a specific order, so we can keep "Executive Order 13902" as is. I'll keep it as "Executive Order 13902" but in Finnish, they might say "toimeenpanomääräys 13902". I'll keep the English term to be safe. So I'll write: "Executive Order 13902:n nojalla" - but that's mixing. Better to keep the whole thing: "Executive Order 13902" as is. So: "Executive Order 13902:n nojalla" - that's fine. Now second paragraph: "Adding digital assets to the list of critical sectors gives the Treasury a direct legal path to sanction businesses that handle Iranian crypto. The move puts the sector on the same footing as oil, shipping, and banking, which have long been subject to the order's reach." Translation: "Digitaalisten varojen lisääminen kriittisten sektoreiden luetteloon antaa Treasurylle suoran oikeudellisen tien sanktioida yrityksiä, jotka käsittelevät Iranin kryptovaluuttoja. Siirto asettaa sektorin samalle tasolle ö