. Translate each.
First paragraph: "The U.S. Treasury on April 1 issued a proposed rule that would let state regulators oversee stablecoin issuers with up to $10 billion in outstanding tokens, provided their state's rules closely match the federal baseline. The notice, published in the Federal Register on April 3 as 91 FR 16844, opens a 60-day comment window that closes June 2."
Translation: "Az Egyesült Államok Pénzügyminisztériuma április 1-jén javaslatot tett közzé, amely lehetővé tenné az állami szabályozóknak, hogy felügyeljék a legfeljebb 10 milliárd dollár kintlévőségű stablecoin-kibocsátókat, amennyiben államuk szabályai nagymértékben megegyeznek a szövetségi alapvonallal. A közlemény, amelyet a Szövetségi Nyilvántartásban (Federal Register) 91 FR 16844 számon, 2025. június 2-án tettek közzé, 60 napos észrevételezési időszakot nyit meg, amely június 2-án zárul." Wait, the date: "April 3" and "June 2" - but we need to check: The original says "April 3 as 91 FR 16844" and "60-day comment window that closes June 2." That seems like a typo? Actually April 3 + 60 days = June 2? April has 30 days, so April 3 + 60 = June 2 (if we count from April 3 to June 2: April has 30 days, so April 3 to May 3 is 30 days, May 3 to June 2 is 30 days, total 60). So yes, June 2. So we translate: "The notice, published in the Federal Register on April 3 as 91 FR 16844, opens a 60-day comment window that closes June 2." -> "A közlemény, amelyet a Federal Registerben 91 FR 16844. számon, 2025. április 3-án tettek közzé, 60 napos észrevételezési időszakot nyit meg, amely június 2-án zárul." But we need to be careful with the year? The original doesn't specify year, but it's likely 2025? Actually the text says "April 1" and "April 3" without year, but later in the article it says "As of July 2026, the rule remains in proposed form" - so it seems the article is written from a future perspective? Actually the original says "As of July 2026, the rule remains in proposed form" - that suggests the article is written after July 2026, but the dates are April 1 and April 3? That's odd. Maybe it's a typo? Let's re-read: "The U.S. Treasury on April 1 issued a proposed rule" - no year. Then "The notice, published in the Federal Register on April 3 as 91 FR 16844, opens a 60-day comment window that closes June 2." Then later: "Comments are due by June 2, 2026, exactly 60 days after the Federal Register publication. As of July 2026, the rule remains in proposed form" So it seems the year is 2026 for the comment deadline. So the publication is April 3, 2026? But then it says "As of July 2026" - so the article is written after July 2026. So we should include the year: April 3, 2026. But the original didn't specify year in the first paragraph, but later it says June 2, 2026. So we can add the year for clarity. In Hungarian, we can say "2026. június 2-án" etc.
Let's translate the first paragraph: "Az amerikai pénzügyminisztérium (U.S. Treasury) 2026. június 1-jén javaslati szabályt adott ki, amely lehetővé tenné az állami szabályozóknak, hogy felügyeljék a legfeljebb 10 milliárd dollárnyi kintlévő tokenekkel rendelkező stablecoin-kibocsátókat, feltéve, hogy államuk szabályai nagymértékben megegyeznek a szövetségi alapokkal. A közlemény, amelyet a Federal Register 2026. június 3-án, 91 FR 16844 számon tett közzé, 60 napos észrevételezési időszakot nyit meg, amely 2026. június 2-án zárul." But wait, April 1 and April 3 - we need to correct: April 1, 2026? Actually the text says "April 1" and "April 3" - so we can say "április 1-jén" and "április 3-án" without year, but later we have June 2, 2026. To be consistent, we can include the year in the first mention: "2026. április 1-jén" and "2026. június 3-án"? But it says "Federal Register on April 3" - so we'll say "ápris 3-án". However, the article later says "As of July 2026" so it's clear the year is 2026. So we can include the year in parentheses or just say "április 3-án" and later mention 2026. But to avoid confusion, we'll include the year for the dates.
Actually, the original doesn't include year in the first paragraph, but it's implied. For translation, we can keep it as "április 1-jén" and "ápris 3-án" without year, because the context later gives the year. But to be precise, we can say "2026. június 1-jén" but that would be wrong because it's April 1. So we'll say "2026. ápris 1-jén" and "2026. ápris 3-án". But the original says "April 1"
