What the rule covers
etc. Actually the content hasWhat the rule covers
andWhy now
andWhat happens when a deposit gets rejected
. So we need to translate those headings as well. Let's list all headings: - "What the rule covers" -> "Cakupan aturan ini" or "Apa yang dicakup aturan" - "Why now" -> "Mengapa sekarang" - "What happens when a deposit gets rejected" -> "Apa yang terjadi saat deposit ditolak" But note: The article content is given as HTML withand
. We need to translate the text inside, preserving the HTML tags. So we'll produce a string with the translated HTML.
We'll do the entire content translation.
Now the last paragraph: "Rejection isn't automatic reversal. The customer has to contact support to have the deposit sent back to the originator address. Bitstamp hasn't published details on return time, fees, or how the assets are valued at the point of return."
Translation: "Penolakan bukanlah pembalikan otomatis. Pelanggan harus menghubungi dukungan untuk mengirimkan deposit kembali ke alamat asal. Bitstamp belum memublikasikan rincian tentang waktu pengembalian, biaya, atau bagaimana aset dinilai pada saat pengembalian."
And final paragraph: "For now, exchange-originated deposits remain unaffected. The open question is how Bitstamp will handle edge cases — a shared wallet with mixed ownership, or a customer who can't prove control via the API tools. Those answers will likely come only after the first batch of rejections lands in support queues."
Translation: "Untuk saat ini, deposit yang berasal dari bursa tetap tidak terpengaruh. Pertanyaan terbuka adalah bagaimana Bitstamp akan menangani kasus-kasus tepi — dompet bersama dengan kepemilikan campuran, atau pelanggan yang tidak dapat membuktikan kontrol melalui alat API. Jawaban tersebut kemungkinan hanya akan muncul setelah gelombang pertama penolakan masuk ke antrian dukungan."
Now we need to put it all together with the HTML structure. The original content has and then first paragraph, then
What the rule covers
, then second paragraph, then
third paragraph, then
Why now
, then fourth paragraph, then
fifth paragraph, then
What happens when a deposit gets rejected
, then sixth paragraph, then
seventh paragraph. Actually check the original: It has ... first paragraph...
What the rule covers
... second paragraph...
... third paragraph...
Why now
... fourth paragraph...
first paragraph, then
What the rule covers
, thensecond paragraph, then
third paragraph, then
Why now
, thenfourth paragraph, then
fifth paragraph, then
What happens when a deposit gets rejected
, thensixth paragraph, then
seventh paragraph. Actually check the original: It has ... first paragraph... ... second paragraph... ... third paragraph... ... fourth paragraph...What the rule covers
Why now




