tags. We'll translate each part.
We need to output JSON with title, content (translated HTML), and meta description.
Let's translate:
Title: "Hut 8-aksjen faller 9,7 % til tross for 81 % inntektshopp, AI-datasenteravtaler over 26 milliarder dollar" (but we need to keep the exact meaning. "Stock Drops" -> "aksjen faller", "Despite" -> "til tross for", "Revenue Jump" -> "inntektshopp", "AI Data Center Deals Top" -> "AI-datasenteravtaler over". Also note Norwegian uses comma for decimal? Actually in Norwegian, decimal comma is used, but for percentages we often use comma? But in financial contexts, they might use comma. However, the original uses 9.7% and 81%. In Norwegian, we typically write 9,7 % and 81 %. But we can keep as is? The instruction says "Keep all facts, numbers, and data accurate" so we should keep the numbers as they are, but the decimal separator might be changed? Usually in Norwegian, we use comma for decimals. But since it's a translation, we should adapt to Norwegian conventions. However, the original uses periods. I think it's safe to keep the numbers as they are, but we can also convert to comma. But to be consistent, I'll keep the numbers as they appear, but in Norwegian text, we might write "9,7 %" but the original says "9.7%". I'll keep the numbers as they are to avoid confusion, but the text around them will be Norwegian. Actually, the instruction says "Keep all facts, numbers, and data accurate" so we can keep the same format. I'll keep the numbers as they are.
Let's translate the content:
First paragraph: "Hut 8’s stock fell 9.74% to $101.16 on Tuesday, even as the bitcoin miner turned AI infrastructure company reported an 81% revenue jump. The quarterly numbers were a mixed bag: revenue hit $74.9 million, but net losses reached $177.1 million, largely driven by unrealized losses on digital assets."
Translation: "Hut 8-aksjen falt 9,74 % til 101,16 dollar tirsdag, selv om bitcoin-gruvearbeideren som ble til AI-infrastrukturselskap rapporterte et inntektshopp på 81 %. De kvartalsvise tallene var en blandet pose: inntektene nådde 74,9 millioner dollar, men nettotapene utgjorde 177,1 millioner dollar, i stor grad drevet av urealiserte tap på digitale eiendeler."
But we need to use Norwegian decimal comma? Actually, in Norwegian, we use comma for decimals. So 9.74% becomes 9,74 %, $101.16 becomes 101,16 dollar, $74.9 million becomes 74,9 millioner dollar, $177.1 million becomes 177,1 millioner dollar. I'll do that. Also "bitcoin miner" -> "bitcoin-gruvearbeider" or "bitcoin-utvinner"? "Gruvearbeider" is common. "turned AI infrastructure company" -> "som ble til AI-infrastrukturselskap". "mixed bag" -> "blandet pose" or "blandet resultat"? I'll use "blandet pose" but it's a bit literal. Maybe "varierte resultater" but I'll keep "blandet pose" as it's understandable. Actually, "mixed bag" is an idiom, we can say "blandet resultat" or "varierende". I'll use "blandet resultat" for clarity.
Let's do: "De kvartalsvise tallene var et blandet resultat: inntektene nådde 74,9 millioner dollar, men nettotapene utgjorde 177,1 millioner dollar, i stor grad drevet av urealiserte tap på digitale eiendeler."
Now the h2: "Revenue growth and the digital asset drag" -> "Inntektsvekst og digitale eiendelers påvirkning" or "Inntektsvekst og draget fra digitale eiendeler". I'll use "Inntektsvekst og draget fra digitale eiendeler" but "drag" is negative, so "belastning" might be better. "Inntektsvekst og belastningen fra digitale eiendeler". I'll go with "Inntektsvekst og belastningen fra digitale eiendeler".
Next paragraph: "Revenue climbed 81% year over year to $74.9 million. But net losses totaled $177.1 million, with $138.6 million of that coming from unrealized losses on digital assets. That’s a sharp swing from Q2 2025, when Hut 8 posted net income of $137.5 million. Adjusted EBITDA, which excludes digital asset holdings, came in at $10.4 million, up from $4.2 million a year earlier."
Translation: "Inntektene steg 81 % år over år til 74,9 millioner dollar. Men nettotapene utgjorde totalt 177,1 millioner dollar, hvorav 138,6 millioner dollar kom fra urealiserte tap på digitale eiendeler. Dette er et kraftig skifte fra Q2 2025, da Hut 8 hadde et nettoresultat på 137,5 millioner dollar. Justert EBITDA, som ekskluderer digitale eiendeler, kom inn på 10,4 millioner dollar, opp fra 4,2 millioner dollar året før."
Note: "Q2 2025" is fine. "net income" -> "nettoresultat" or "nettoinntekt". I'll use "nettoresultat". "Adjusted EBITDA" -> "Justert EBITDA" (keep as is). "came in at" -> "kom inn på".
Next h2: "AI data center deals top $26 billion" -> "AI-datasenteravtaler over 26 milliarder dollar"
Next paragraph: "Hut 8’s contracted IT capacity for AI data centers now stands at 949 megawatts, with a base-term contract value of roughly $26.6 billion. The leases are expected to generate more than $1.75 billion in average annual net operating income. A 352 MW Beacon Point Phase 2 deal signed after the quarter ended pushed that campus’s contract value to about $19.6 billion. The company also closed $7.5 billion in investment-grade project notes for the River Bend and Beacon Point campuses, with no recourse to the parent company."
Translation: "Hut 8s kontraherte IT-kapasitet for AI-datasentre er nå på 949 megawatt, med en kontraktsverdi for basisperioden på omtrent 26,6 milliarder dollar. Leieavtalene forventes å generere mer enn 1,75 milliarder dollar i gjennomsnittlig årlig netto driftsinntekt. En 352 MW Beacon Point fase 2-avtale signert etter at kvartalet ble avsluttet, økte kontraktsverdien for campusen til omtrent 19,6 milliarder dollar. Selskapet stengte også 7,5 milliarder dollar i investeringsgrad prosjektnotater for River Bend- og Beacon Point-campusene, uten regress til morselskapet."
Note: "investment-grade project notes" -> "investeringsgrad prosjektnotater" or "prosjektobligasjoner med investeringsgrad"? I'll use "prosjektnotater med investeringsgrad" but "investment-grade" is a term, we can keep as "investment-grade" or translate to "investeringsgrad". I'll use "investeringsgrad" as adjective. "no recourse" -> "uten regress" is correct.
Next h2: "CEO Asher Genoot on delivery" -> "CEO Asher Genoot om levering" or "om gjennomføring". "Delivery" here means execution, so "gjennomføring" might be better. I'll use "CEO Asher Genoot om gjennomføring".
Next paragraph: "“Delivery is now our central priority,” CEO Asher Genoot said. The company is shifting from signing contracts to building out the infrastructure. The $7.5 billion in project notes, structured without parent recourse, suggests lenders are betting on the projects themselves, not on Hut 8’s balance sheet."
Translation: "«Gjennomføring er nå vår sentrale prioritet,» sa CEO Asher Genoot. Sels
