tags. We need to translate each paragraph.
Let's break down the content:
First paragraph: "Prime Minister Andy Burnham is preparing to revoke the Gambling Act's 'aim to permit' duty, a move that would reverse a longstanding presumption in favor of granting gambling licenses. Burnham has opposed the duty for years, and as mayor of Greater Manchester he signed a council coalition letter demanding exactly this change. Parliament passed a narrower fix in April, but the prime minister now intends to go further."
We need to translate to Korean. We'll keep "Andy Burnham" as is, "Greater Manchester" as "그레이터맨체스터" or keep original? We can keep as "Greater Manchester" but for readability, we can use "그레이터맨체스터". But since it's a proper noun, we can keep "Greater Manchester" in original. However, in Korean articles, they often transliterate place names. But requirement says keep proper nouns in original form, so we should keep "Greater Manchester" as is. Also "Parliament" is "의회" or "국회" but we can use "의회". "April" is "4월". We'll do a natural translation.
Let's write:
"앤디 번햄 총리는 도박법의 '허가 허용' 의무를 폐지할 준비를 하고 있다. 이는 도박 허가를 승인하는 방향의 오랜 기본 원칙을 뒤집는 조치다. 번햄은 수년간 이 의무에 반대해 왔으며, 그레이터맨체스터 시장으로서 정확히 이 변화를 요구하는 지방의회 연합 서한에 서명한 바 있다. 의회는 4월에 더 좁은 범위의 수정안을 통과시켰지만, 총리는 이제 더 나아가려 한다."
But we need to be accurate: "Prime Minister" - in UK, it's "총리" (Prime Minister). But note: Andy Burnham is the Prime Minister in this context (fictional? Actually it's a news article, but we treat it as given). So "총리" is appropriate. Also "revoke" -> "폐지" or "철회". We'll use "폐지" as in scrap. "reverse" -> "뒤집다" or "반전시키다". We'll say "뒤집는 조치". "longstanding presumption" -> "오랜 기간의 추정" or "오랜 관행". We'll say "오랜 기간 유지된 추정". "in favor of granting" -> "허가를 부여하는 방향의". So "도박 허가를 부여하는 방향의 오랜 추정을 뒤집는 조치" is good.
Second paragraph: "The 'aim to permit' duty means licensing authorities must assume they should grant a gambling application unless there's a strong reason not to. Critics say that tilts the process toward operators and makes it harder for councils to reject new venues, even when local communities object."
Translation: "'허가 허용' 의무는 인허가 당국이 강력한 반대 사유가 없는 한 도박 신청을 승인해야 한다고 가정해야 한다는 것을 의미한다. 비판자들은 이로 인해 절차가 사업자 쪽으로 기울어지고, 지역 사회가 반대하더라도 지방의회가 새로운 업소를 거부하기가 더 어려워진다고 말한다."
We need to be precise: "licensing authorities" -> "인허가 기관" or "허가 기관". "councils" -> "지방의회" or "지방자치단체". We'll use "지방의회".
Third paragraph: "Burnham's opposition isn't new. Before becoming prime minister, he lobbied against the duty, and during his time as Greater Manchester mayor he put his name to a coalition letter from councils demanding its removal. That letter argued that the duty undermines local decision-making and puts the burden of proof on residents rather than the industry."
Translation: "번햄의 반대는 새로운 것이 아니다. 총리가 되기 전부터 그는 이 의무에 반대하는 로비를 했으며, 그레이터맨체스터 시장으로 재임하는 동안 그는 지방의회들의 연합 서한에 서명하여 폐지를 요구했다. 그 서한은 이 의무가 지역 의사결정을 훼손하고 입증 책임을 업계가 아닌 주민에게 지운다고 주장했다."
We need to use "총독" for prime minister? Actually "Prime Minister" is "총리" in Korean. So "총리가 되기 전" instead of "총독". "총독" is for governor general. So we use "총리". Also "mayor
