tags. Translate text. First paragraph: "Asian chip stocks tumbled on Tuesday, with SK Hynix falling nearly 13% and Samsung Electronics dropping over 12%, as investors weighed reports that Nvidia is negotiating a $250 billion guarantee to help OpenAI lease a 10-gigawatt data center campus in Ohio. The sell-off erased billions of dollars in market value and fueled concerns that Nvidia's financial backstop role signals fragility in AI-linked demand." Note: Original says "erased billions in market value across Korea, Japan, and Taiwan in a single session" - keep that. Translation: "亚洲芯片股周二暴跌，SK海力士下跌近13%，三星电子下跌超过12%，投资者正在评估有关英伟达正在谈判提供2500亿美元担保以帮助OpenAI租用俄亥俄州一个10吉瓦数据中心园区的报道。此次抛售在单日内抹去了韩国、日本和台湾数十亿美元的市场价值，并加剧了担忧：英伟达的财务支持角色可能表明与人工智能相关的需求脆弱。" Second paragraph: "Nvidia is reportedly in talks to provide a $250 billion guarantee to secure the lease for OpenAI's planned Ohio data center, a project that could cost more than $500 billion in total. The chipmaker is also discussing financing for OpenAI's chip purchases, worth up to $350 billion more. Investors have questioned whether Nvidia's willingness to underwrite such massive commitments indicates that AI demand is not as robust as previously thought, or that OpenAI itself lacks the capital to fund its own expansion." Wait original says "more than $500 billion in total" and "worth up to $350 billion more". Check: original says "a project that could cost more than $500 billion in total" and "worth up to $350 billion more". Yes. Translation: "据报道，英伟达正在谈判提供2500亿美元担保，以确保OpenAI计划中的俄亥俄州数据中心园区的租约，该项目总成本可能超过5000亿美元。这家芯片制造商还在讨论为OpenAI的芯片采购提供融资，金额高达3500亿美元。投资者质疑，英伟达愿意承销如此庞大的承诺，是否表明人工智能需求并不像之前认为的那样强劲，或者OpenAI本身缺乏资金来支持其扩张。" Note: $250 billion = 2500亿美元? Actually $250 billion is 2500亿? In Chinese, 1 billion = 10亿, so $250 billion = 2500亿. But often in financial news, they use "2500亿美元". Similarly $500 billion = 5000亿美元, $350 billion = 3500亿美元. That's fine. Third paragraph: "Meanwhile, the sell-off hit memory makers particularly hard, with SK Hynix and Samsung both losing more than a tenth of their value in early trading." Actually original says "The sell-off hit memory makers particularly hard, with SK Hynix and Samsung both losing more than a tenth of their value in early trading." It's part of second paragraph? In original, after "own expansion." there is a new sentence: "The reports come as the broader semiconductor sector faces a reality check after months of AI-driven euphoria. The sell-off hit memory makers particularly hard, with SK Hynix and Samsung both losing more than a tenth of their value in early trading." So it's separate. I'll include it as part of the second paragraph or as a separate paragraph? The original has it as part of the same paragraph after "own expansion." Actually original: "The reports come as the broader semiconductor sector faces a reality check after months of AI-driven euphoria. The sell-off hit memory makers particularly hard, with SK Hynix and Samsung both losing more than a tenth of their value in early trading." That is still within the same
? In the given HTML, it's within the same
after the first sentence? Let's check: The original content has
Nvidia is reportedly... own expansion.
The reports come as... early trading.
? Actually the provided HTML shows:Nvidia is reportedly... own expansion.
The reports come as the broader semiconductor sector faces a reality check after months of AI-driven euphoria. The sell-off hit memory makers particularly hard, with SK Hynix and Samsung both losing more than a tenth of their value in early trading.
So it's two separate paragraphs. I'll follow that. So second paragraph: "Nvidia is reportedly... own expansion." Translation as above. Third paragraph: "The reports come as the broader semiconductor sector faces a reality check after months of AI-driven euphoria. The sell-off hit memory makers particularly hard, with SK Hynix and Samsung both losing more than a tenth of their value in early trading." -> "这些报道发布之际，整个半导体行业在经历了数月的人工智能热潮后正面临现实检验。此次抛售对内存制造商打击尤为严重，SK海力士和三星在早盘交易中均下跌超过十分之一。" Next section:
